[The AFL Player Spectator] New comment on Botched Rape Investigation - AFL Player Walks.
Greg has left a new comment on your post "Botched Rape Investigation - AFL Player Walks":
Kate, thank you for your clarifying comments. I think it's pretty clear what's happened here in terms of discussing in the media (supposedly) confidential compensation.
Matthew, you keep dodging around this and throwing up other issues. It's not whether or not Kate was compensated years later. It's about you refusing to explain your "muddying the waters" comments. This is a dangerous "blame the victim" smear used too often by footy fans when their heroes are caught out.
Let me re-iterate. Do you still maintain that the way Kate handled the confidentiality clause impacts on her credibility as to what happened that night and the subsequent police investigation?
Is that what you meant by "muddying the waters"?
Are you now prepared to concede that Kate's allegations and claims were not aimed at winning compensation?
Posted by Greg to The AFL Player Spectator at 11:41 PM, September 01, 2009
Kate, thank you for your clarifying comments. I think it's pretty clear what's happened here in terms of discussing in the media (supposedly) confidential compensation.
Matthew, you keep dodging around this and throwing up other issues. It's not whether or not Kate was compensated years later. It's about you refusing to explain your "muddying the waters" comments. This is a dangerous "blame the victim" smear used too often by footy fans when their heroes are caught out.
Let me re-iterate. Do you still maintain that the way Kate handled the confidentiality clause impacts on her credibility as to what happened that night and the subsequent police investigation?
Is that what you meant by "muddying the waters"?
Are you now prepared to concede that Kate's allegations and claims were not aimed at winning compensation?
Posted by Greg to The AFL Player Spectator at 11:41 PM, September 01, 2009
<< Home